BIG Plans Revealed For Two Penn Plaza Transformation

Two Penn Plaza
Comments (19)
  1. Tom says:

    BIG’s design is the best for the future art architectures, such as this building waving her skirt on the ground.

  2. Leslie says:

    The obvious inspiration is Marilyn Monroe standing over the train grates.

  3. Rich says:

    Creative and practical. I love it!

  4. Austin says:

    futuristic looking hopefully it won’t disappoint

  5. JK_12 says:

    This design is ridiculous. Looking at BIG’s architecture somehow always reminds me of ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’. Some of his buildings are utterly horrid and yet the media and public in general don’t dare say it because Bjarke the hot new name on the streets and in everyone’s mouth. What ever happened to elegant and beautiful architecture? It’s like the game today is the whackiest wins.

  6. Mad says:

    For those of us commuters who are doomed to use Penn Station, anything other than what’s there now is an improvement. However, fancy buildings like this don’t address the squalid nature of Penn Station itself. I would rather see clean, safe restrooms and escalators that work and are going in the proper direction to and from the platforms for arriving and departing trains than award-winning architecture. Also, it’s in Vornado’s best interests to address the chronic crime and homelessness in the area.

  7. sv says:

    Love watching Bjarke’s presentations for their building projects. But very few of his projects seem to come with a video. Would love to understand how they arrived at the concept. This looks great.

  8. sv says:

    This is no where close to wacky. It’s a very gradual and graceful transition, evolution.

  9. Archi-nerd says:

    This is redic. It would be a nice enough building without the billowing dress at the bottom.

  10. JK_12 says:

    BS. I don’t buy this stuff anymore. Just likeTrump, it was fun watching it at the beginning but as time passes you realize we’re in a f’d up state of crisis. Do you really think we’ll look at this in 50 years and say ‘wow, what great architecture!’?. I reeeeeeeeeeeally doubt it.

  11. Evelyn Tully Costa says:

    Another RIDICULOUS homage to BORING, BLAND, BANAL. Seriously sketch-up mediocrity, so ok, we get the” 7 Year Itch” reference out of which spurts yet another glass cereal box accounting sheet. And no sense that there should be HEIGHT for the commuter rats below….The emperor architect and lemming followers have NO clothes nor imagination…and New York is supposed to be the fulcrum of CREATIVITY and we get more of THIS nonsense????

  12. DanO says:

    While having the 7th Ave plaza under cover would be nice, one has to wonder how they plan to handle the rain? Continuous channels from the façade above, and cantilevered well out with no potential for a ground connection. A nice summer burst and you’re looking at a couple hundred waterfalls each pouring 3-10 gallons a minute. Good luck crossing the street, or getting out of a cab!

    As to the “design”? Ennhhh. . . It’s still a box

  13. Haruki Chou says:

    “lipstick on a pig”.
    Even with those changes, Two Penn Plaza still manages to make a particularly negative impact, and its placement above Penn Station is unchanged.

  14. George Haikalis says:

    The tragedy of this plan is that a comprehensive vision for the entire area from 9th Avenue to 6th Avenue and from 34th Street to 31st Street has yet to be developed. The city should take the lead and put all the pieces together. Especially worrisome is the loss of public open space in this dense and crowded piece of Manhattan.

    A larger view should include the use of streets (and surface light rail transit) and the connectivity of subsurface elements.

    NYC, with its outstanding collection of designers, engineers and architects should be able to do much more with the Penn Station, Madison Square Garden and the 7th and 8th Avenue subway complexes plus the Herald Square complex.

    Isn’t anyone in charge?

    George Haikalis
    Institute for Rational Urban Mobility

  15. mac says:

    “lipstick on a pig”? That’s insulting to all the poor old pigs of this world. No, this is just a dressed up turd. Nothing to make commuting from the Hell hole known as “Penn Station” more bearable. This just makes more ground level retail and commercial space for the owners to rent out and takes away from the existing landscaped plaza. No matter how inferior it is, it’s still green space and it will be gone all to create a glorified covered mall. And yes, what about the torrents of rain washing off those peeled up ribbons of glass? Stepped boxes masquerading as a skyscraper and now this piece of garbage? What has happened to architecture?

  16. Warlock says:

    Yeah, yeah, just wait until the great “bait and switch” er “value engineering” takes place and the final product is not much more than an updated version of the existing structure: a garden variety office building, with updated mechanicals and a “refresh” of the retail levels to contemporary standards, instead of anything closely resembling what’s being touted in the renderings, marketing materials and press releases!

  17. Ho-se says:

    lipstick on a pig.. that’s American.

  18. riverville says:

    The best renovation for Two Penn Plaza would be the wrecking ball.

  19. PJE says:

    Two Penn, MSG, and Penn Station are a disgrace to NYC. Utter crap, built like crap, designed like crap. This is the block in all of NYC that has to be razed, designed and rebuilt as a single project and the premier transit hub in America .

    Unfortunately One Penn gets lumped in with this yet that is the building that could be updated and redressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *